Author Archive

Greg Barker visits Amazonas

Saturday, April 25th, 2009 | This post was written by Greg Barker MP

 Just before Christmas I visited Brazil to see for myself the front line in the battle against rainforest deforestation.

Deforestation accounts for 25% of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, more than the whole global transport sector. Without urgent action to halt deforestation, we haven’t a chance of beating global Climate Change. 

After meeting local government representatives in the state of Manaus, I travelled to the Juma reserve in Amazonas, a ‘high risk’ area of the rainforest and home to some 322 local families.

Normally families such as these are under severe economic and sometimes physical pressure to deforest their land to make way for pastureland or highway expansion, but in the Juma reserve, the Amazonas State Government is pioneering a new model of sustainable development.

By placing a monetary value on the standing forest, patrons of the project from across the globe can invest in a kind of carbon offset by contributing to the project’s running costs.

So how does it work? The residents of the Juma reserve receive vital infrastructure investment, resources for teaching and business development and assistance with sustainable farming. In return, they become guardians of the forest, pledging to monitor and safeguard every tree in the protected area.

During my visit, the overwhelming impression was of a community eager for progress and development. Education, access to healthcare and technology are all desperately needed in Juma and through this project there is a clear win for sustainable development as well as avoided deforestation.

The inhabitants of the reserve that I met were well aware that the benefits of deforesting their land are short-term and insufficient to guarantee any real improvement in their quality of life. They explained, though, that economic pressure and an unwillingness to sacrifice their community life for a move to neighbouring cities such as Manaus, had left communities such as theirs with few alternatives.

Families on the Juma reserve are currently planning a new school, a solar  panel and a clinic in a truly unique example of progress going hand in hand with sustainability and a respect for the autonomy and way of life of the indigenous people. If the current rate of destruction continues elsewhere, however, not only will communities like Juma suffer, but global temperature, rainfall, even oxygen levels will all be affected in ways we are currently powerless to combat.

Rainforests are far more that just huge carbon sinks. They are not only the ‘lungs’ of the world but are also home to an incredible 50% of all of the world’s species of animals and plants, existing together in a fragile equilibrium. Yet with 50,000 plants, animals and insects becoming extinct every year due to rainforest deforestation, we stand to lose one to two thirds of all species of plants, animals, and other organisms during the second half of the next century. The less diverse an ecosystem the less stable and productive it is, which is why the extraordinary biodiversity of the rainforest makes it one of the most important and unique environments on the planet. If this ecosystem were to crash, the knock on effect for the rest of the world would be disastrous.

In the time it took to read this sentence, 3 acres of rainforest have disappeared. If deforested, Juma alone would have released 210 million of tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere. To say there will be no rainforest left by 2050 seems a vague and distant threat. 1 .6 billion people left without homes or livelihood is too great a number to imagine. Over a quarter of Western medicine comes from rainforests, but only 1% of plants have been tested for medicinal qualities so far. Once this habitat is destroyed and the species contained in it become extinct, we can never replace them.  

But without urgent action and strong leadership, not just from the West but through partnerships with governments in the developing world, this is a very real danger.

On my return we decided that CCHQ and the leader’s office would offset our unavoidable emissions through the Juma scheme, joining other patrons like the Marriot Hotel chain in seeing the added benefits of this kind of approach. I’m pleased to say that my constituency office will also be joining the scheme.

Strong bilateral projects like Juma, that recognise the true value of rainforests and their communities, are our best chance of reducing deforestation in the short term. On a more ambitious, long term scale Britain should be taking a lead in driving a truly comprehensive global deal on CO2 emissions that will allows countries like Brazil to realise the true value of their standing timber.

This year’s Copenhagen summit will be a vital first step towards settlement.   

 

 

Government sells out British business with campaign for Carbon Credit imports

Friday, October 3rd, 2008 | This post was written by Greg Barker MP

Last week a leaked Government document revealed that Labour Ministers are now lobbying the EU to allow Britain to meet up to half of its 2020 emissions reductions targets by buying credits from the developing world.

In March 2006 Labour dropped their commitment, repeated in three successive manifestos, to make a much needed 20% cut in domestic carbon emissions by 2010. Given the Government’s dismal failure to make any reduction in emissions whatsoever since 1997, it’s not hard to imagine why.

Despite this complete failure to make effective change in the past, the 2020 targets offer a new opportunity for Britain: not just to show international leadership on Climate Change and to cut millions of tonnes of carbon emissions, but for the growth of British business, employment and prosperity. By paying others to make carbon reductions for us, Labour are selling Britainshort by subsidising abroad the positive changes we need to make at home.

There are many thousands of new and well paid jobs that would be created in the UK with a major national push on energy efficiency, on microgeneration and renewable energy technologies. Yet if we are only to pick the lowest hanging fruit of cheap emissions reductions in Britain and simply turn to the carbon markets and pay developing countries to fill the gap on the cheap, we will lose the opportunity to lead the world in converting to a low-carbon economy.

If we opt to only make the minimum of reductions here at home we will still lumber on with business as usual, using old and energy inefficient practices and lock in a new generation of polluting infrastructure that will become increasingly expensive for us to offset in the future, as the cost of polluting increases with a rising carbon price.

Labour’s appalling record on emissions is set to cost us not just from now till 2020. The planned new dirty power stations and infrastructure these target reductions would allow them to build could cost the economy for the next 50 years.

This is not the way it has to be – and not the way the Conservative Party views the climate challenge. Other countries are embracing change: Germanyalready has over 250,000 jobs in renewable technologies. Yet Britain has, at best, 15,000. We don’t even know exactly how many green tech jobs we have in the UK because the Government doesn’t bother to count them!

Both Barack Obama and John McCain have declared that they see 5 million new ‘green collar jobs’ being created in the new US energy economy. Indeed it is expected that global green industries will be worth £350 billion a year by 2010 – as big as the global aerospace industry is today. How much of this global industry, these new jobs and skills, will be in the UK? That is the opportunity before us today – and we can be sure that if Britain doesn’t move to seize this new market, others will.

While the reduction of carbon being dumped into the atmosphere will be the same regardless of where it happens – and it must happen, our political leaders must ensure that as much of the economic opportunity as possible remains here in Britain. No one pretends that squeezing more efficiency out of our economy will all be easy, but at a time of economic stress for Britain Gordon Brown should be looking for ways to create more jobs in the UK, not lobbying to use tax payer’s money to lose those new green collar jobs to our competitors abroad.