<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Defence Of Red Toryism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-defence-of-red-toryism</link>
	<description>Campaigning for a modern liberal Conservative Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:28:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Platform 10 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Platform 10&#8242;s Review Of The Year Part 1 &#8211; The Best Political Books Of 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-50111</link>
		<dc:creator>Platform 10 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Platform 10&#8242;s Review Of The Year Part 1 &#8211; The Best Political Books Of 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-50111</guid>
		<description>[...] article hit the newsstands a few years ago and his Respublica think-tank, the launch of which I reviewed very favourably, has proven to be a great success.  The publication of Red Tory put plenty of flesh on the bone.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article hit the newsstands a few years ago and his Respublica think-tank, the launch of which I reviewed very favourably, has proven to be a great success.  The publication of Red Tory put plenty of flesh on the bone.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24144</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by DJSkelton: New PLATFORM 10 Blog:  A Defence Of Red Toryism http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by DJSkelton: New PLATFORM 10 Blog:  A Defence Of Red Toryism <a href="http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/.." rel="nofollow">http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24138</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24138</guid>
		<description>&#039;lack of adequate regulation had nothing to do with the global economic crisis&#039;

Now let&#039;s not get started on that one. :)

I thought Alex Massie had the best take on Red Toryism. 

http://www.spectator.co.uk/alexmassie/5576011/blond-and-liberty.thtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;lack of adequate regulation had nothing to do with the global economic crisis&#8217;</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s not get started on that one. <img src='http://www.platform10.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I thought Alex Massie had the best take on Red Toryism. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/alexmassie/5576011/blond-and-liberty.thtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.spectator.co.uk/alexmassie/5576011/blond-and-liberty.thtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Skelton</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24131</link>
		<dc:creator>David Skelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24131</guid>
		<description>Michael - Thanks, as ever, for your interesting comments, which I will respond to in turn.

On almost every social issue I would describe myself as a social liberal.  The fact that my liberalism is a mix between positive (freedom to) and negative (freedom from) liberalism certainly doesn&#039;t make it any less valid than yours.  Nor does the fact that I wish to see the professions more representative of society make me a member of the &quot;authoritarian left&quot;.  Indeed, my desire for real social mobility and the enhancement of the life chances of people from more deprived backgrounds is why I&#039;m so enthusiastic in support of the wide ranging schools reform and &#039;pupil premium&#039; that we are promising after the next election.

It seems we aren&#039;t going to agree on the merits of Disraeli and Macmillan.  Although I do judge them by their actions and their effectiveness as Prime Ministers.

I&#039;m a strong believer in capitalism and the free market.  I agree with you that it is the best way in which to achieve prosperity.  But lets not pretend it is perfect.  Lets not pretend that lack of adequate regulation had nothing to do with the global economic crisis.  Lets not pretend that monopoly power isn&#039;t an important issue in some sections of the economy.  Regulation is over heavy in some areas, particularly on small business and, in other areas, particularly banking, it has been proven to be way too light.  My point was that the free market should serve society and not the other way round.

Regarding the mines and other closures in the Thatcher years (and also, as you rightly say, beforehand as well), my point was that the closure of the industries that dominated towns has had the effect of losing a glue that held certain communities together.  Even Norman Tebbitt agrees with me on this.  As he said a few months ago, &quot;The scale of the closures went too far...There is no doubt that this led to a breakdown in these communities. Many were completely devastated, with people out of work turning to drugs and no real man’s work because all the jobs had gone.&quot;

It would be going very off topic to discuss energy policy here but I would argue that we haven&#039;t had a coherent energy policy in this country for much too long.  An over-reliance on gas and oil (now imported from semi or slightly hostile nations) and a dash away from coal, surely brings with it risks in terms of energy security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8211; Thanks, as ever, for your interesting comments, which I will respond to in turn.</p>
<p>On almost every social issue I would describe myself as a social liberal.  The fact that my liberalism is a mix between positive (freedom to) and negative (freedom from) liberalism certainly doesn&#8217;t make it any less valid than yours.  Nor does the fact that I wish to see the professions more representative of society make me a member of the &#8220;authoritarian left&#8221;.  Indeed, my desire for real social mobility and the enhancement of the life chances of people from more deprived backgrounds is why I&#8217;m so enthusiastic in support of the wide ranging schools reform and &#8216;pupil premium&#8217; that we are promising after the next election.</p>
<p>It seems we aren&#8217;t going to agree on the merits of Disraeli and Macmillan.  Although I do judge them by their actions and their effectiveness as Prime Ministers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a strong believer in capitalism and the free market.  I agree with you that it is the best way in which to achieve prosperity.  But lets not pretend it is perfect.  Lets not pretend that lack of adequate regulation had nothing to do with the global economic crisis.  Lets not pretend that monopoly power isn&#8217;t an important issue in some sections of the economy.  Regulation is over heavy in some areas, particularly on small business and, in other areas, particularly banking, it has been proven to be way too light.  My point was that the free market should serve society and not the other way round.</p>
<p>Regarding the mines and other closures in the Thatcher years (and also, as you rightly say, beforehand as well), my point was that the closure of the industries that dominated towns has had the effect of losing a glue that held certain communities together.  Even Norman Tebbitt agrees with me on this.  As he said a few months ago, &#8220;The scale of the closures went too far&#8230;There is no doubt that this led to a breakdown in these communities. Many were completely devastated, with people out of work turning to drugs and no real man’s work because all the jobs had gone.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be going very off topic to discuss energy policy here but I would argue that we haven&#8217;t had a coherent energy policy in this country for much too long.  An over-reliance on gas and oil (now imported from semi or slightly hostile nations) and a dash away from coal, surely brings with it risks in terms of energy security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24122</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24122</guid>
		<description>David, since when have you been &quot;socially liberal&quot;?  Your preoccupation with pigeon-holing people by gender, school and class is reminiscent of the authoritarian left, not a liberal.  Liberals can cope with all kinds of difference.  You clearly have big problems with it, unless the people in question belong to officially-sanctified &quot;minorities&quot;.  

There is a lot of myth-making about the empathy of people like Disraeli and MacMillan with the working classes.  They talked the talk but were as anti-meritocratic as every other patrician One Nation Tory.  That is why my late father refused to switch from Labour to the Tories until Thatcher came along.  He didn&#039;t particularly love her but unlike MacMillan, she was a grammar school-educated meritocrat and she wasn&#039;t a condescending and cynical old fraud.  

Your wailing about &quot;free market fundamentalism&quot; sounds rather like &quot;stop the world I want to get off.&quot;  We live in a very highly-regulated global economy, not some early nineteenth century laissez faire free for all. That global economy has radically improved the life chances of hundreds of millions especially in those former Third World nations which have embraced capitalism.  Good luck to them.  However, we in the UK will no longer be able to rule the roost as we did in the past; awarding ourselves large amounts of pay and perks for producing substandard goods and services.  We will have to sing much better for our supper.  Too much political criticism of globalisation is simply a demand for protectionism.

Your constant jibing at the one post-war leader of the UK who actually made a credible effort to put it back on its feet is tedious.  I too come from England&#039;s former industrial heartland.  Thatcher made major mistakes but what would you have done differently?  Are you proposing that we reopen the mines or steelworks?  In any case, far more pits were shut under the Butskellite Consensus than were shut between 1979 and 1997.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, since when have you been &#8220;socially liberal&#8221;?  Your preoccupation with pigeon-holing people by gender, school and class is reminiscent of the authoritarian left, not a liberal.  Liberals can cope with all kinds of difference.  You clearly have big problems with it, unless the people in question belong to officially-sanctified &#8220;minorities&#8221;.  </p>
<p>There is a lot of myth-making about the empathy of people like Disraeli and MacMillan with the working classes.  They talked the talk but were as anti-meritocratic as every other patrician One Nation Tory.  That is why my late father refused to switch from Labour to the Tories until Thatcher came along.  He didn&#8217;t particularly love her but unlike MacMillan, she was a grammar school-educated meritocrat and she wasn&#8217;t a condescending and cynical old fraud.  </p>
<p>Your wailing about &#8220;free market fundamentalism&#8221; sounds rather like &#8220;stop the world I want to get off.&#8221;  We live in a very highly-regulated global economy, not some early nineteenth century laissez faire free for all. That global economy has radically improved the life chances of hundreds of millions especially in those former Third World nations which have embraced capitalism.  Good luck to them.  However, we in the UK will no longer be able to rule the roost as we did in the past; awarding ourselves large amounts of pay and perks for producing substandard goods and services.  We will have to sing much better for our supper.  Too much political criticism of globalisation is simply a demand for protectionism.</p>
<p>Your constant jibing at the one post-war leader of the UK who actually made a credible effort to put it back on its feet is tedious.  I too come from England&#8217;s former industrial heartland.  Thatcher made major mistakes but what would you have done differently?  Are you proposing that we reopen the mines or steelworks?  In any case, far more pits were shut under the Butskellite Consensus than were shut between 1979 and 1997.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24117</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24117</guid>
		<description>Quite right on thatcher - &#039;back where she belongs&#039;? What? I have as much respect for what she did as anyone but it was 30 years ago, times have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite right on thatcher &#8211; &#8216;back where she belongs&#8217;? What? I have as much respect for what she did as anyone but it was 30 years ago, times have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Melville</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24115</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Melville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24115</guid>
		<description>Frugal Dougal: Whose &#039;fault&#039; it is is not really the point - to coin a phrase much-loved by an old boss of mine, we are where we are.  And sadly where we are is that many of our communities are falling apart. If we believe that Conservative means achieve the progressive end of bringing back the social glue, then Phillip Blond has some excellent ideas.

Though - as David Cameron said at the launch today - we don&#039;t agree on everything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frugal Dougal: Whose &#8216;fault&#8217; it is is not really the point &#8211; to coin a phrase much-loved by an old boss of mine, we are where we are.  And sadly where we are is that many of our communities are falling apart. If we believe that Conservative means achieve the progressive end of bringing back the social glue, then Phillip Blond has some excellent ideas.</p>
<p>Though &#8211; as David Cameron said at the launch today &#8211; we don&#8217;t agree on everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugal Dougal</title>
		<link>http://www.platform10.org/2009/11/a-defence-of-red-toryism/comment-page-1/#comment-24114</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugal Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.platform10.org//?p=780#comment-24114</guid>
		<description>I take your point about losing the pits, but that was a fight that was brought to Thatcher, not the other way round.  When Scarghill&#039;s ascent began, a lot of the &quot;old guard&quot; at the NUM started resigning - they knew what was coming.  A lot of his members were striking for better pay and conditions, but he wanted to kick-start a coup that would end up in regime change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take your point about losing the pits, but that was a fight that was brought to Thatcher, not the other way round.  When Scarghill&#8217;s ascent began, a lot of the &#8220;old guard&#8221; at the NUM started resigning &#8211; they knew what was coming.  A lot of his members were striking for better pay and conditions, but he wanted to kick-start a coup that would end up in regime change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

