Change debate

To St Thomas’s Hospital last night for joint Progress and Policy Exchangedebate, “Has David Cameron Changed the Conservative Party for Good?”.

On the panel, for the Conservatives, the double act of Fraser Nelson andMichael Gove while Progress put forward Labour’s immigration minister Liam Byrne and Times columnist David Aaronovitch.  

The meeting was, if not packed, then certainly busy with a few hundred eager politicos from across the spectrum there to hear the debate. No real surprises in any of the arguments put forward – which Fraser neatly summarises here

What was interesting was the paucity of arguments from Liam Byrne. The attack – same old Tories just a bit more media savvy – seemed limp and reminded me of the Tory’s confused campaign strategy in 1997 which tried to convince the public that Tony Blair was nothing more than an old Labour statist who would bring the country to its knees. 

David Aaronovitch’s analysis was better argued: that there has been a failure inside the Conservatives to address the changing world we live in. And our position on Europe puts the party out-of-step with the public and global real politick. I’ve argued before that we need to talk more about the world and less about the EU, but I disagree that the thinking isn’t there. The party simply needs to talk about it more. 

So, a debate about change in the Conservative party. At the end of the evening had anyone changed their mind? Of course not.

Related posts:

  1. Let’s use the Conference to have a civilised debate
  2. Gordon Brown cannot be the change the country needs
  3. Change to win
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>